一切, 就源於投票資格制度有問題

Came across a rather interesting discussion in the 香港討論區 Forum:

http://www9.discuss.com.hk/viewthread.php?tid=
1911662&extra=page%3D1

我夠可以入去果o的學會做正式會員囉, 咁又點?
我點解要做果o的會o既會員, 先至可以投票先? 要每年俾會費去維持個會員資格, 間接「享有」投票權?
點解我唔可以用我的「工作經驗」同「學歷」, 去證明我有資格加入資訊科技界裡面投票先?

一切, 就源於投票資格制度有問題.....

Well said xita.

As for the main discussion of "單仲偕議員呀,咁多年你為資訊科技界做過什麼?"... I rather like the question: "咁你想佢做 d 咩, 可唔可以講講...." Good question chivan. Well, perhaps first of all, to do something about the eligibility structure of the IT functional constituency. Looking at the work SCK has done in the past, his records at the legco meetings, I think it is unfair to say that he hasn't contributed to the industry and HK in general. Nevertheless, the fact that there is a complete lack of any meaningful evolution of the eligibility requirements of the ITFC leaves much to be desired.

I will echo xita's sentiment to say that the eligibility should be based on being in the IT industry and not having to pay for membership in some association. There should be a simple process to identify and declare one as an IT professional to satisfy the eligibility requirement. This process should also be free.